I get to witness this awesomeness in 3 nights!
More clips here .
Love that drummer.
|
|||||
|
Monday, January 24
by
Sean
on January 24, 2011 08:15AM (PST)
Wednesday, January 19
Is "please put your smaller carry-on under the seat in front of you" the most ignored statement in the world?
No one offers any 'free if you eat the whole thing' promotions on starchy food" because we are designed to get fat when we eat Carbs, and one way our body accomplishes that is by depressing the hormone that makes us feel satiated. I'm pretty sure Tallest Man on Earth put out the album of the year. And the Coens put out the best movie. Did any of you get Rolled by me this week? I know I'm lame for doing it, but it was the perfect trap. How is that Florence + The Machine album? I was going to buy it, and then started hearing it everywhere... I even heard Dog Days on Glee. Yeah yeah, I watch glee. I am engaged.. To Karen. Saw the Skinny President pics a month ago .... remember what i said about him golfing so much? I hear he gave a good speech at the Safeway service. I feel the whole post-shooting brouhaha was pretty manipulative. Not by him, per se, but definately for him and for that speech.
by
Sean
on January 19, 2011 04:08PM (PST)
Monday, January 10
Dave just sent me a link the best thing on the internet at the present moment.
by
Sean
on January 10, 2011 11:55AM (PST)
Lileks, Goldberg, Steyn... and Sajak!
That's good radio. They poke fun at the New york times for their unintentionally hilarious editorial full of stuff like this: "it is a presumptuous and self-righteous act, suggesting that they alone
understand the true meaning of a text that the founders wisely left open
to generations of reinterpretation" Mark Steyn just responded, sarcastically:"I think in a multicultural society it is offensive that people of many different cultures to read to them the constitution of the country they are living in". He continues brilliantly: "I hope in that spirit the democrats read the European Union Constitution on the floor so then we'll go home till Jan 2013 because they won't have wrapped it up by then" Heh. There is some funny stuff.
by
Sean
on January 10, 2011 08:47AM (PST)
Thursday, January 6
Park tavern's flirtation with supra-mediocrity has died, not by fire, but by ice. There hjust wasn't enough ice to chill the Sashimi AND the ice rink, but the Crab stick was pretty frozen. Yes, normal programming has resumed.
Titus Andronicus on the other hand, is good. (Its got two movements, so stick with it). And here (UPDATED LINK) is a video of a whole mini-set. Enjoy. And check out the solo-humor at 4:40.
by
Sean
on January 6, 2011 07:38AM (PST)
Wednesday, January 5
I wrote to a friend who wanted to know what dietary studies had been done in the last 10 years. After I sent it, I wondered if Taubes had his blog up, since he would be able to tackle this better than I. Turns out he just started his blog and his first entry was on the exact same two studies I dug up. His remarks were substantively identical. This is less extraordinary, and incriminating, when you accept just how far up his ass I have crawled. I am quite comfortable here.
Mine: Here is one such study, done in 2007 at Stanford, comparing Atkins, Ornish, zone, and Traditional Kudos to the NIH for
grudgingly admitting that low-card diets are better.... but shame on
them for hidingl the bankruptcy of the low-fat diet they themselves have
advocated for decades.http://nutrition.stanford.edu/documents/AZ_abstract.pdf this one, funded by the NIH compares low-fat to low-carb.. and the conclusions are similar. http://www.annals.org/content/153/3/147.abstract?aimhp This second one frustrates me... Its fine that they controled for behavior -meaning the made people exercise- but they don't measure or mention the effects of that control: Numerous studies have shown that low-fat calorie restricted diets make its adherents miserable, irritable, hungry, and unhealthy. This study demonstrates the unhealthiness of that approach when compared to the low card diet as it pertains to heart health, but ignores the other stuff. The low-fat diet appears to be simply a less effective alternative, but in reality it's not an alternative at all. If they measured well being, muscle loss during the study or the likeliness to adhere to diet after the study, you would see that that any benefits of low-fat approach are illusory..... His
by
Sean
on January 5, 2011 06:57AM (PST)
Second Ten Shots at 30ft.
![]()
by
Sean
on January 5, 2011 06:51AM (PST)
Tuesday, January 4
Ok, so Taubes released a short version of the poorly named Good Calories / Bad Calories. This version, called 'Why we get fat", is great. It even has a chapter devoted to the same topic of my recent screed: How the logical conclusion of the incorrect Calorie Hypothesis is to blame the victim and then smugly pat yourself on the back for not being sick.
You can read on in two hours, and probably should. I need to go see social Network, now the True Grit is out. From what I hear , Social Network is flawless. From what I saw, True Grit is flawless.
by
Sean
on January 4, 2011 06:55AM (PST)
|
|
||||
|
|||||






